Character discussion: Visser One
Oct. 31st, 2010 11:54 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
...That's the first Visser One. I found it interesting how she started playing politics against Visser Three after she got her position yanked, and the Anis were kinda in the middle...she didn't tell about them because of the intent to use it against Visser Three, but there was a lot of deception and trickery by the group to keep her from the free Hork-Bajir while at the same time trying to stick one to the Visser.
What I don't get, why didn't she drop out of Eva earlier and go for the Kendrona when she was being executed? Would she have been stomped if she had?
What I don't get, why didn't she drop out of Eva earlier and go for the Kendrona when she was being executed? Would she have been stomped if she had?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-01 05:22 pm (UTC)Edriss, to me, is the invert to Aftran. If Aftran's capable of empathizing with her hosts and capable of wonder at the complexities of the human mind. Edriss is too, with one caveat; just because she understands (or thinks she does) doesn't really mean she cares, or even better, doesn't mean she won't use it to get exactly what she wants.
Edriss thinks she understands human love. She doesn't. She doesn't even get close. The most chilling line in Visser besides "I made Jenny Lines breathe" is "...I could always infest Madra, place some well-trained Yeerk in her head.
Then she would love me. She’d have no choice". I mean, seriously, WTF Edriss, that's not how it works you nutter. She sees the consequences of human emotion but doesn't really grasp the WHY. There's also a great series of lines where Edriss rages at Allison Kim for 'betraying' her, arguing that she treated Allison kindly and was used, betrayed, tricked. Edriss honestly doesn't see why her hosts all hate her. She has the reputation as the Yeerk who opened up the human mind, but she can't really shift her perspective to that of her hosts. She can only project what seems logical and rational to her onto them, and then gets flustered when they respond like humans instead of Yeerks.
That said, for those shortcomings, she's still better at it than other Yeerks, because she can predict what humans will do, as she did by creating the Sharing and by anticipating how Allison Kim would return to the hospital. That's part of why she hates Marco so much during Visser - she can't predict him, and then partway through the book he turns the tables on her in a way she didn't anticipate. Oh does she hate him. But she's easily smarter than Esplin and probably than a few of the Council Members, and is the most devious and intelligent Yeerk we see in the series.
In T9, someone brought up the idea that Allison may have been cultivating the love for Hildy/Essam and not Edriss, as a way to fuck with Edriss/assert autonomy. Upon rereading some chapters, it seems like that may be implied, that Allison is 'playing' Edriss by trying to push her towards Hildessam. Possibly Allison was even trying to set Edriss up for a challenge, sort of a 'bet you can't seduce him' sort of thing, because Edriss is totally in it for the challenge. I get the sense that while Edriss is ambitious and manipulative, it's not so much because she wants the glory, it's because she likes the challenge. She likes the challenge of ascending the ranks. She likes the challenge of finding a Class Five species, of being in a clever host, of trying to master human emotions. She absorbs knowledge like a sponge. She's outright disappointed in Jenny Lines for not fighting back.
I do love that she listens to her hosts' advice, though. The bits where she and Eva are piecing together what's going on in the trial are some of my favorites, and I can't see Esplin asking for Alloran's advice, for example.
Anyway, the point is that I love Edriss and find her absolutely fascinating. I have more thoughts on this, but I just want to put this up there because people are apparently psyched for Mah Magnificent Thoughts. <3
no subject
Date: 2010-11-01 10:32 pm (UTC)because you're totally right--visser is one of the deepest character studies we get in the entire series, and it's not just edriss as an individual we investigate, but the entire yeerk character and psychology overall. It's kind of sad, in a way, that they are so defined by domination, even on a deep level like that they're still obsessed with owning it, controlling it. Even when influenced by the *cosmically charged power of love*, all they want to do is dominate.
lol you put it much better than I did, but that is a really haunting line, and it's kind of that clinching detail, that climactic turning point, when we realized Edriss hasn't been changed by her experience as a human. She learned a lot, but even humanity, which this series seems to tout as granted with an overwhelming capacity for resilience and power, she turned to her old ways.
It makes me wonder what the real reason behind picking Eva was, too. We know it's because Eva was a mother, but why did she need to be? I'm thinking, based on your reading of it, it's because Edriss still didn't really understand what it meant. She could predict Allison's actions, but I don't think she understood the powerful, instinctual driving force behind them, that could make even a brilliant and rational person like Allison behave exactly as Edriss expected her too.
I like your reading of Allison/Hildy/Essam/Edriss' relationship, too, and it kind of answers a canon question of mine which is--whose kids are Madra and Darwin? Who expressed the desire and consent to make them? I really didn't think the text answered the question, which kind of infuriated me, but I also kind of understood the meaning behind it, like ~*~we're not supposed to know~*~ and it's supposed to show how little we actually own control of our actions at all, but I think you're right. Edriss and Essam had plenty of opportunities before infesting Allison and Hildy to conduct an affair--they were both in Hork-Bajir and in two other humans before. So was their love theirs? No, I think that they were more along for the ride than anything. Allison and Hildy, through whatever motivation, fell in love with each other, and Essam and Edriss simply indulged their deeper instincts.
I also think that ties into the fact that Edriss didn't stop taking coke or whatever when Jenny was addicted to it. I think that detail clinches that Yeerks are just as susceptible to petty human addictions and emotions as humans themselves, perhaps even moreso. An interesting reading of it, thanks for posting that, I thought about it all through my salad :)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-01 11:52 pm (UTC)That being said, when they can make you relive every memory or sensation in crystal clear perfection, I'm not sure why they'd still need to rely on drugs.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 01:48 am (UTC)Though I will admit there's a lot of discrepancy between just how much of a host's experience the Yeerk has to also experience. Wasn't there some line about them being able to quiet the pain or something? idk I feel like it changed in the middle at some point.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 03:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 12:13 am (UTC)and no I will never get over that being the shortest book in the series.Personally, I think that played a huge factor in why she picked Eva. She sort of just thought she could swap mothers/wives for each other, since they must all be the same, right? And she still didn't understand it, and wanted to understand it, but never really figured out how.
The other thing is that though we see very little of Eva in the series, she's incredibly strategic, and at points in Visser is piecing things together faster than Edriss can. And she espouses that 'free or dead' mentality that Edriss admired so much in Allison. We also know that Eva broke Edriss' control at least a few times ("don't join the military", "no, you have to kill her", and Peter mentions that it seemed like Eva was struggling with something before she died). So I think Edriss liked the challenge Eva presented, and that's why she kept her as her primary hosts.
Side note: the bit about Edriss keeping watch on her children through other hosts? How many other hosts did this biatch have? So much AWESOME fridge horror as to what all her other hosts did while she was running around in one of her warm bodies.
Great point about the coke, too. I do think Edriss represents a lot of the darker parts of humanity, which again, makes her the flip to Aftran, who is 'saved' through humanity while Edriss just gets more and more depraved and petty than she already was.
I wish I could take credit for the Allison/Hildy reading, but someone on AIM from trans9 suggested it and then I was all "that's brilliant!" and totally kiped it.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 02:17 am (UTC)ughhh the first time she mentioned having more than one host I was like "LOL WHAT IS THERE SOME BUFFALO BILL WELL IN YOUR BASEMENT WTF GURL"
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 03:39 am (UTC)but that just might be my fangirlishness spiking out of control, idk
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 03:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 03:49 am (UTC)wtf
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 04:15 am (UTC)never thought of her as one, though
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 04:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 02:51 am (UTC)And while Hildy and Alison's emotional natures probably contributed, I like to think (and think it's in the text) that to an extent it was the Yeerks' romance as well--perhaps they never had an affair earlier because they were still getting to know one another, growing closer during their exile, and things came to a head while influenced somewhat by Hildy and Alison. I just think it's more interesting and epic, these two aliens falling in love and playing it out in these two hosts, and the hosts following suit.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 02:57 am (UTC)But I mean, I think it's perfectly acceptable for you to read it that way. It just never really sat right with me. Maybe it's not supposed to though, idk.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 01:27 am (UTC)It's also interesting that in Visser we see that Marco thinks like his mom and is much closer to her in many ways than he was to his dad. Of course, computer engineering requires a similar kind of thought, but it's less the vicious bright line than mental Legos. Still, I wonder if that of thinking was what brought Peter and Eva together in the first place? Maybe they met at a chess tournament or something.
Watch as I extrapolate tons of junk from a few short scenes.
Date: 2010-11-02 03:36 am (UTC)Anyway, I always saw Peter and Eva kind of working together by tempering each other. Eva wouldn't put up for Peter's self-pitying baloney and Peter would bring out the sweet, vulnerable side of Eva (who's sharp as a whip but seems very proud). So together they kind of balanced. His relationship with Nora was different because after Eva 'died' and he mourned for years, he had to learn to stand on his own two feet, in a sense, and be a responsible adult. By the time Nora came along, he didn't need someone pressing him to be said responsible adult, so he could love Nora over shared passions and making-out-on-the-couch instead. A no less valid love, but a different one.
/blah blah blah I read too much into Peter and I love him even though he is Failure Dad in the Sad Cave.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 01:37 am (UTC)And oooh yes. She definitely does not get how love works - and when you think about it, she doesn't care about the kids themselves. She cares for the idea of them, for the concept of "her children". She protects them because as far as she is concerned, they belong to her.